Pages

Wednesday, October 7, 2015

Low-Carb Cornless Cornbread

Okay, here is another recipe I found on the web. This low-carb cornbread made without any cornmeal comes to us from Maria Mind Body Health LLC and includes an additional recipe for cornbread stuffing. Today, I will only be discussing the cornbread. The cornbread recipe does not list nutritional information, but the stuffing recipe has only 4.4 carbs per serving and 2.2g of fiber, so I would expect the cornbread to be a little less than that. (Click the link to get the recipes.)

First, I set the oven to 350 to preheat and rounded up the ingredients. I needed coconut flour, salt, baking soda, eggs, and butter. (The recipe calls for coconut oil as written, but I opted for butter instead.)



Next, I sifted the dry ingredients together into one bowl and melted the butter in another bowl. The recipe says to stir the liquids into the dry ingredients until smooth. Mrs. Fox Falcon advised that the dry should be stirred into the wet. So, we did it her way. After letting the butter cool enough to not cook the eggs (but while it was still liquid), we mixed the butter with the raw eggs and stirred the dry ingredients in. Once it resembled a batter, I poured it into a greased loaf pan.



Bake it at 350 for 40-50 minutes or until a toothpick comes out clean. Then, via the magic of the Internet, it looks a little something like this:


So, how did it turn out? Well, I've made it twice now and it was delicious both times. It really does taste a lot like cornbread! Friends and relatives who are not on low-carb diets found it quite tasty as well. The coconut flour may give it a slight bluish tinge, but this is common. You may also notice a mild coconut flavor, but it seems to diminish after a night in the refrigerator to rest and let the flavors mingle.


As you can see, this cornbread was quite popular. By the time I could get my camera out, only two lonely pieces were left...and they didn't last long. Yum!

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

The Great Fat Debate

We all know reducing dietary fat is a necessary part of healthy nutrition, especially when trying to lose weight. But is that really true? It depends, as it turns out.

First, a little history. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, nutrition experts began to recommend diets low in fats for patients carrying excess body weight. Low-fat diets were also recommended as part of a heart-healthy lifestyle. Dietary fat was thought to convert easily into body fat and to clog arteries, thereby raising the risk of heart attack. This resulted in an explosion of new low-fat food options, as food companies scrambled to remove the fat from their products to meet an ever increasing demand for "healthy" low-fat convenience foods. "Fat-free" became the rallying cry of the day.

Something else happened about this time as well; rather than the population getting healthier, obesity, heart disease, Type II diabetes, and other inflammation-related diseases became problems of epidemic proportions in the American population. True, some people did get healthier on low-fat diets, but the population as a whole experienced an incredible upsurge in health problems. Only in recent years have we truly become aware of the extent of this situation.

This outcome was no coincidence. Fat is a primary source of flavor in foods. When manufacturers began cutting fat, they needed a way to replace the lost flavor, because consumers did not want to eat healthy food that tasted like cardboard. The solution? Add carbs, which are the other main source of flavor in foods. Usually, the added carbs were in the form of sugars.

It is also notable that it was in the 1970s and 1980s that soft drinks became the American beverage of choice. They had been popular since the early 1900s, but it was in the Generation X years that soft drinks became truly ubiquitous. Bottles and cans of soda that were once around 6 or 7 ounces doubled in size. By the 1980s, soda could be purchased in "personal size" containers of as much as 64 ounces or more! What had once been an infrequent treat began to be consumed in massive quantities, especially by children and teens. These were also the golden years of breakfast cereals, brimming over with added sugar and often served with orange juice. Sugar, sugar, sugar. Sugar everywhere.

Moving forward a few decades, recent studies now suggest that dietary fat has less to do with these health problems than once thought (although certain fats are still known contributors). If anything, sugar has replaced fat as enemy number one in the push for better health. Sugary foods have been clearly shown to accelerate tooth decay, promote insulin resistance that leads to diabetes, and cause inflammation. It is inflammation in the arteries that ultimately gives so-called "bad" cholesterol (LDL) a place to clump, thus contributing to arterial blockage and heart disease risk. Plus, sugar in the body that goes unused gets converted to fat and stored for later use, thus causing weight gain. If you are struggling to lose weight on a low-fat diet, check your carb intake, especially sugar carbs.

When it comes to dietary fats, there are three basic types: Unsaturated fats, saturated fats, and trans fats. Not all of these fats are bad. In fact, some are quite necessary and healthy.

Unsaturated fats are the oils and fats your body needs most for proper functioning. They generally are liquids at room temperature, and can be obtained from nuts, seeds, fish, and olive oil. Depending on the source, they can raise HDL cholesterol, reduce LDL cholesterol, lower triglycerides, and reduce inflammation. As long as you don't exceed your overall daily recommended caloric intake, you may freely enjoy unsaturated fats guilt-free.

Saturated fats are also needed by the body in low amounts for the proper utilization of vitamins. They are often in solid form at room temperature, such as butter, lard, and tallow. If you have ever seen the solidified grease left after making bacon, you were looking at saturated fat. Coconut oil is a saturated fat that is especially nutritious and may have limited antiseptic properties. Although saturated fats are not quite as evil as once thought, too much saturated fat can elevate LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, so enjoy these fats only in moderation.

Trans fats are made by bubbling hydrogen through fats in the presence of a catalyst to chemically saturate the fat. This is often done to make fats more solid at room temperature, such as with some vegetable shortenings and margarines. Your body does not want trans fats. It does not need trans fats. Check your labels and don't buy foods that contain these fats. In the ingredients, these fats are often describes as "partially hydrogenated oils". Trans fats have been implicated more than any other fats as contributors to inflammation and heart disease. If you eat lots of saturated fats, trans fats, and lots of sugar, you are practically begging to have a heart attack. Fortunately, many manufacturers are eliminating trans fats from their foods now, and many communities are starting to ban trans fats in restaurant food.

In summary, not all fats are good and not all fats are bad. A healthy diet should include plenty of unsaturated fats, a small to moderate amount of saturated fats, and should eliminate trans fats entirely. It is also a good idea to greatly reduce sugar, and get your fiber and other carbs from unprocessed or minimally processed whole foods such as vegetables, fruits, and whole grain multi-grain breads. Monitor your blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and triglycerides. Exercise. And always remember to consult with your doctor when modifying your nutrition plan.

Sunday, September 27, 2015

Slow-Cooker Balsamic Chicken

Here at the Fox Falcon's Nest, we just bought a new slow-cooker bearing the logo of our local NFL team, so this seemed to be a good time to renew my long-neglected blog. While we will be having hamburgers tonight during the football game, we broke in the new crock yesterday with the following recipe for Balsamic Chicken.


Since this is not my own recipe, I will respect copyright by letting you read it where I found it, at SkinnyMs.com. (Link should open in a new tab or window in most browsers so you don't lose your place here.) This recipe is naturally low-carb, which made it especially attractive for us.

Since we have never made this dish before, I decided to follow the recipe exactly. First, I inserted a slow-cooker liner. I love these things; they make cleanup a breeze. If you are worried about BPA, these liners are made of a nylon compound that does not contain BPA or other nasties that might leach into your food. It's the same stuff used to make turkey roasting bags.


I oiled the bottom of the liner as per the recipe and layered the chicken breasts in the bottom of the cooker. Next came the onion slices and herbs (Don't forget the garlic! Yum!), followed by the balsamic vinegar and diced tomatoes. I used canned tomatoes, but you could easily dice your own if you are so inclined. With everything in place, I put on the lid and turned the cooker to "High".


Unfortunately, I remembered I had to pull a rare Saturday afternoon shift at work, so I got dressed and turned the heat down to "Low" since it would be about 8-9 hours before we could eat it. This was an unplanned deviation from the recipe. Usually, you can trade between "High" for 4 hours or "Low" for 8 hours on most slow-cooker recipes, but this recipe seemed sensitive to the change, as the chicken seemed a bit dry when we did finally eat.


The recipe suggests serving this dish over angel hair pasta. Since pasta is generally too high in carbs for us, I served this up with a side of "Cornless Cornbread" and cauliflower with cheese sauce (not pictured). I'll post about the cornbread another time.

All in all, this was a very good recipe, and Mrs. Fox Falcon said she would be glad to add this to our meal rotation. Next time, I'll try cooking on "High" for the prescribed 4 hours and see if that improves the moistness of the chicken. For this meal, we just shredded the chicken with a fork and poured a little juice over it. Dee-lish!

Note: Unless I state otherwise, any brands you see in my photos or in the text of the posts are the brands I choose to use at home and is not intended as endorsement of one brand over another. I do not normally do paid product endorsements, and the appearance of a brand in my blog posts does not imply endorsement of this blog by the brand owners.